Difference between revisions of "Category talk:LDS Terms"

From HymnWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: It seems to me that it would be useful to have a category for general LDS terms (not, in most cases, specifically music-related, but included in HymnWiki.org to facilitate comprehension by...)
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
It seems to me that it would be useful to have a category for general LDS terms (not, in most cases, specifically music-related, but included in HymnWiki.org to facilitate comprehension by non-Mormon readers). Among many others that might well go here, it occurs to me that the names of the constituent books in the Book of Mormon might be good, since LDS hymnals frequently refer to them, not so much in the texts as in the notes. --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 00:25, 25 July 2007 (MDT)
+
It seems to me that it would be useful to have a category for general LDS terms (not, in most cases, specifically music-related, but included in HymnWiki.org to facilitate comprehension by non-Mormon readers). Among many others that might well go here, it occurs to me that the names of the constituent books in [[the Book of Mormon]] might be good, since LDS hymnals frequently refer to them, not so much in the texts as in the notes. --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 00:25, 25 July 2007 (MDT)
 +
:Good idea.  I think I'll make a [[Book of Mormon]] article, with links to articles for each book. [[User:Veramet|Veramet]] 01:28, 25 July 2007 (MDT)

Latest revision as of 01:28, 25 July 2007

It seems to me that it would be useful to have a category for general LDS terms (not, in most cases, specifically music-related, but included in HymnWiki.org to facilitate comprehension by non-Mormon readers). Among many others that might well go here, it occurs to me that the names of the constituent books in the Book of Mormon might be good, since LDS hymnals frequently refer to them, not so much in the texts as in the notes. --Haruo 00:25, 25 July 2007 (MDT)

Good idea. I think I'll make a Book of Mormon article, with links to articles for each book. Veramet 01:28, 25 July 2007 (MDT)