https://hymnwiki.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ADeseret_Sunday_School_Songs%2C_1909 2026-10-06T06:11:23Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.39.13 https://hymnwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Deseret_Sunday_School_Songs,_1909&diff=3281&oldid=prev 2007-05-19T01:26:36Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 01:26, 19 May 2007</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I take it the NPOV fetish that prevails at Wikipedia hasn't come hither. ;-) --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 13:49, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I take it the NPOV fetish that prevails at Wikipedia hasn't come hither. ;-) --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 13:49, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Ah - this is a great point.  It hasn't come hither, actually - at least not yet.  I didn't write the article, myself, FYI.  I actually tend to disagree - I think I know who wrote it, though, and he probably wrote it light-heartedly.  I figure, for now, if people don't agree, they can always change it.  However, it makes sense to put this in force.  I mean, I would hate to have people bashing a compilation or hymn directly in the article.  If people really want to state their opinions, they can do it on the forums (in this case, it would be on the [http://www.nabble.com/HymnWiki%3A-Hymnal-Discussion-f22711.html hymnal discussion forum] or perhaps rather the [http://www.nabble.com/Hymnal-Reviews-f22707.html Hymnal Reviews forum]).  Whatever the case, it won't be ''exactly'' like Wikipedia's way if I institute it. I'll probably just say 'do not post biased content' and let people interpret that for themselves; this is, after all, a site for hymns (and not everything controversial the world has to offer).  Yeah, I think I'll just tell people not to state their own opinions in articles.  I can't tell people not to post biased hymns, as some historical hymns really are biased (and many hymns are biased to one religion or another, anyway) - but editor commentary/bias should be labeled appropriately.  I've added this to the [[HymnWiki:Appropriate content|appropriate content]] page, though I suppose it still needs work. [[User:Veramet|Veramet]] 19:<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">24</del>, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Ah - this is a great point.  It hasn't come hither, actually - at least not yet.  I didn't write the article, myself, FYI.  I actually tend to disagree - I think I know who wrote it, though, and he probably wrote it light-heartedly.  I figure, for now, if people don't agree, they can always change it.  However, it makes sense to put this in force.  I mean, I would hate to have people bashing a compilation or hymn directly in the article.  If people really want to state their opinions, they can do it on the forums (in this case, it would be on the [http://www.nabble.com/HymnWiki%3A-Hymnal-Discussion-f22711.html hymnal discussion forum] or perhaps rather the [http://www.nabble.com/Hymnal-Reviews-f22707.html Hymnal Reviews forum]).  Whatever the case, it won't be ''exactly'' like Wikipedia's way if I institute it. I'll probably just say 'do not post biased content' and let people interpret that for themselves; this is, after all, a site for hymns (and not everything controversial the world has to offer).  Yeah, I think I'll just tell people not to state their own opinions in articles.  I can't tell people not to post biased hymns, as some historical hymns really are biased (and many hymns are biased to one religion or another, anyway) - but editor commentary/bias should be labeled appropriately.  I've added this to the [[HymnWiki:Appropriate content|appropriate content]] page, though I suppose it still needs work. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Please tell me any comments/advice you might have.  I'm pretty flexible with ''most'' things.  Thanks for joining HymnWiki, by the way! </ins>[[User:Veramet|Veramet]] 19:<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">26</ins>, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td></tr> </table>

Veramet https://hymnwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Deseret_Sunday_School_Songs,_1909&diff=3280&oldid=prev 2007-05-19T01:24:49Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 01:24, 19 May 2007</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I take it the NPOV fetish that prevails at Wikipedia hasn't come hither. ;-) --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 13:49, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I take it the NPOV fetish that prevails at Wikipedia hasn't come hither. ;-) --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 13:49, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Ah - this is a great point.  It hasn't come hither, actually - at least not yet.  I didn't write the article, myself, FYI.  I actually tend to disagree - I think I know who wrote it, though, and he probably wrote it light-heartedly.  I figure, for now, if people don't agree, they can always change it.  However, it makes sense to put this in force.  I mean, I would hate to have people bashing a compilation or hymn directly in the article.  If people really want to state their opinions, they can do it on the forums (in this case, it would be on the [http://www.nabble.com/HymnWiki%3A-Hymnal-Discussion-f22711.html hymnal discussion forum] or perhaps rather the [http://www.nabble.com/Hymnal-Reviews-f22707.html Hymnal Reviews forum]).  Whatever the case, it won't be ''exactly'' like Wikipedia's way if I institute it. I'll probably just say 'do not post biased content' and let people interpret that for themselves; this is, after all, a site for hymns (and not everything controversial the world has to offer).  Yeah, I think I'll just tell people not to state their own opinions in articles.  I can't tell people not to post biased hymns, as some historical hymns really are biased (and many hymns are biased to one religion or another, anyway) - but editor commentary/bias should be labeled appropriately.  I've added this to the [[HymnWiki:Appropriate content|appropriate content]] page, though I suppose it still needs work. [[User:Veramet|Veramet]] 19:24, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Veramet https://hymnwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Deseret_Sunday_School_Songs,_1909&diff=3274&oldid=prev 2007-05-18T19:49:44Z

<p>Just a bit gushy in the description?</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>I take it the NPOV fetish that prevails at Wikipedia hasn't come hither. ;-) --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 13:49, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div>

Haruo