Talk:Deseret Sunday School Songs, 1909 - Revision history

https://www.hymnwiki.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ADeseret_Sunday_School_Songs%2C_1909 Talk:Deseret Sunday School Songs, 1909 - Revision history 2026-05-01T12:00:23Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.30.0 https://www.hymnwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Deseret_Sunday_School_Songs,_1909&diff=3281&oldid=prev Veramet at 01:26, 19 May 2007 2007-05-19T01:26:36Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr style="vertical-align: top;" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 01:26, 19 May 2007</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I take it the NPOV fetish that prevails at Wikipedia hasn't come hither. ;-) --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 13:49, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I take it the NPOV fetish that prevails at Wikipedia hasn't come hither. ;-) --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 13:49, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Ah - this is a great point.  It hasn't come hither, actually - at least not yet.  I didn't write the article, myself, FYI.  I actually tend to disagree - I think I know who wrote it, though, and he probably wrote it light-heartedly.  I figure, for now, if people don't agree, they can always change it.  However, it makes sense to put this in force.  I mean, I would hate to have people bashing a compilation or hymn directly in the article.  If people really want to state their opinions, they can do it on the forums (in this case, it would be on the [http://www.nabble.com/HymnWiki%3A-Hymnal-Discussion-f22711.html hymnal discussion forum] or perhaps rather the [http://www.nabble.com/Hymnal-Reviews-f22707.html Hymnal Reviews forum]).  Whatever the case, it won't be ''exactly'' like Wikipedia's way if I institute it. I'll probably just say 'do not post biased content' and let people interpret that for themselves; this is, after all, a site for hymns (and not everything controversial the world has to offer).  Yeah, I think I'll just tell people not to state their own opinions in articles.  I can't tell people not to post biased hymns, as some historical hymns really are biased (and many hymns are biased to one religion or another, anyway) - but editor commentary/bias should be labeled appropriately.  I've added this to the [[HymnWiki:Appropriate content|appropriate content]] page, though I suppose it still needs work. [[User:Veramet|Veramet]] 19:<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">24</del>, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Ah - this is a great point.  It hasn't come hither, actually - at least not yet.  I didn't write the article, myself, FYI.  I actually tend to disagree - I think I know who wrote it, though, and he probably wrote it light-heartedly.  I figure, for now, if people don't agree, they can always change it.  However, it makes sense to put this in force.  I mean, I would hate to have people bashing a compilation or hymn directly in the article.  If people really want to state their opinions, they can do it on the forums (in this case, it would be on the [http://www.nabble.com/HymnWiki%3A-Hymnal-Discussion-f22711.html hymnal discussion forum] or perhaps rather the [http://www.nabble.com/Hymnal-Reviews-f22707.html Hymnal Reviews forum]).  Whatever the case, it won't be ''exactly'' like Wikipedia's way if I institute it. I'll probably just say 'do not post biased content' and let people interpret that for themselves; this is, after all, a site for hymns (and not everything controversial the world has to offer).  Yeah, I think I'll just tell people not to state their own opinions in articles.  I can't tell people not to post biased hymns, as some historical hymns really are biased (and many hymns are biased to one religion or another, anyway) - but editor commentary/bias should be labeled appropriately.  I've added this to the [[HymnWiki:Appropriate content|appropriate content]] page, though I suppose it still needs work. <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Please tell me any comments/advice you might have.  I'm pretty flexible with ''most'' things.  Thanks for joining HymnWiki, by the way! </ins>[[User:Veramet|Veramet]] 19:<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">26</ins>, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td></tr> </table>

Veramet https://www.hymnwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Deseret_Sunday_School_Songs,_1909&diff=3280&oldid=prev Veramet at 01:24, 19 May 2007 2007-05-19T01:24:49Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr style="vertical-align: top;" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 01:24, 19 May 2007</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I take it the NPOV fetish that prevails at Wikipedia hasn't come hither. ;-) --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 13:49, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I take it the NPOV fetish that prevails at Wikipedia hasn't come hither. ;-) --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 13:49, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Ah - this is a great point.  It hasn't come hither, actually - at least not yet.  I didn't write the article, myself, FYI.  I actually tend to disagree - I think I know who wrote it, though, and he probably wrote it light-heartedly.  I figure, for now, if people don't agree, they can always change it.  However, it makes sense to put this in force.  I mean, I would hate to have people bashing a compilation or hymn directly in the article.  If people really want to state their opinions, they can do it on the forums (in this case, it would be on the [http://www.nabble.com/HymnWiki%3A-Hymnal-Discussion-f22711.html hymnal discussion forum] or perhaps rather the [http://www.nabble.com/Hymnal-Reviews-f22707.html Hymnal Reviews forum]).  Whatever the case, it won't be ''exactly'' like Wikipedia's way if I institute it. I'll probably just say 'do not post biased content' and let people interpret that for themselves; this is, after all, a site for hymns (and not everything controversial the world has to offer).  Yeah, I think I'll just tell people not to state their own opinions in articles.  I can't tell people not to post biased hymns, as some historical hymns really are biased (and many hymns are biased to one religion or another, anyway) - but editor commentary/bias should be labeled appropriately.  I've added this to the [[HymnWiki:Appropriate content|appropriate content]] page, though I suppose it still needs work. [[User:Veramet|Veramet]] 19:24, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Veramet https://www.hymnwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Deseret_Sunday_School_Songs,_1909&diff=3274&oldid=prev Haruo: Just a bit gushy in the description? 2007-05-18T19:49:44Z

<p>Just a bit gushy in the description?</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>I take it the NPOV fetish that prevails at Wikipedia hasn't come hither. ;-) --[[User:Haruo|Haruo]] 13:49, 18 May 2007 (MDT)</div>

Haruo